Jan. 26, 2026

Research Driven Leadership with Dr. Marshall Jones

Research Driven Leadership with Dr. Marshall Jones
The player is loading ...
Research Driven Leadership with Dr. Marshall Jones

Send us a text We explore why culture beats cash, how leader–member exchange strengthens trust, and why sergeants are the keystone of retention. Dr. Marshall Jones makes the case for borrowing proven business models, fixing communication beyond email, and putting guardrails on AI so cases stand up in court. • education versus training and why the difference matters • applying business and I‑O psychology models to policing • toxic behavior definitions and positive accountability • building a ...

Send us a text

We explore why culture beats cash, how leader–member exchange strengthens trust, and why sergeants are the keystone of retention. Dr. Marshall Jones makes the case for borrowing proven business models, fixing communication beyond email, and putting guardrails on AI so cases stand up in court.

• education versus training and why the difference matters
• applying business and I‑O psychology models to policing
• toxic behavior definitions and positive accountability
• building a leadership pipeline from FTO to sergeant
• leader–member exchange as the daily discipline
• communication beyond email with face‑to‑face touchpoints
• recruiting less by retaining more through culture
• research bias, better data, and practitioner context
• AI report risks, court scrutiny, and policy safeguards

Dr. Jones is the co-author of the best-selling book, "Law Enforcement Leadership, Management, and Supervision." It's a must-read, and you can purchase it here

Join other courageous leaders at TravisYates.org


Join Our Tribe of Courageous Leaders:

Get The Book
Get Weekly Articles by Travis Yates
Join Us At Our Website
Get Our 'Courageous Leadership' Training
Join The Courageous Police Leadership Alliance

Chapters

00:00 - Meet Dr. Marshall Jones

02:30 - Education Versus Training In Policing

06:30 - Adapting Business Models To Law Enforcement

10:30 - Generational Shifts And Retention

15:20 - Defining Toxic Behavior And Accountability

20:40 - Culture First: The Leadership Pipeline

25:10 - Why Research In Policing Lags

30:00 - Bias, Data, And Interpreting Studies

35:30 - Leader–Member Exchange In Practice

Transcript
WEBVTT

00:00:01.679 --> 00:00:11.039
Welcome to Courageous Leadership with Travis Yates, where leaders find the insights, advice, and encouragement they need to lead courageously.

00:00:11.759 --> 00:00:13.199
Welcome back to the show.

00:00:13.199 --> 00:00:17.039
I'm so glad and honored to decide to spend a few minutes with us here today.

00:00:17.039 --> 00:00:19.600
And today's guest is exciting.

00:00:19.600 --> 00:00:21.440
I'm so honored to have Dr.

00:00:21.440 --> 00:00:24.480
Marshall Jones on the show for you today.

00:00:24.480 --> 00:00:34.560
He combines his background as a law enforcement practitioner, trainer, and consultant with his applied research experience to explore and understand individual and organizational behavior.

00:00:34.560 --> 00:00:46.719
He's a practitioner in the heart, and Marshall considers himself an accidental academic who has earned his graduate education in criminology and industrial organizational psychology while working full-time in law enforcement.

00:00:46.719 --> 00:00:49.679
He also holds a doctorate degree in business administration.

00:00:49.679 --> 00:00:54.399
He's a co-author of Law Enforcement Leadership Management and Supervision.

00:00:54.399 --> 00:00:57.119
It's the book that uh you've already familiar with.

00:00:57.119 --> 00:01:01.119
Uh, we had John on the show a few weeks ago, and we're excited to have him.

00:01:01.119 --> 00:01:01.439
Dr.

00:01:01.439 --> 00:01:02.560
Jones, how are you, sir?

00:01:02.719 --> 00:01:03.119
Well, Dr.

00:01:03.119 --> 00:01:04.799
Yates, it is my pleasure to be here.

00:01:04.799 --> 00:01:06.560
And please, it's just Marshall.

00:01:06.879 --> 00:01:16.480
Well, I'm I'm always super curious when I speak to law enforcement officers that went and continued their education and they did, you know, because it's obviously very difficult to do on the job.

00:01:16.480 --> 00:01:19.439
I did it late in my career, and I sort of understand that.

00:01:19.439 --> 00:01:21.519
What drove you to do that?

00:01:21.519 --> 00:01:25.920
Because it certainly you don't have to, it doesn't necessarily give you any bonus points in the profession.

00:01:25.920 --> 00:01:29.840
Sort of what drove your uh drove you because you have a bunch of degrees.

00:01:29.840 --> 00:01:31.359
I just mentioned a few of them.

00:01:31.359 --> 00:01:32.799
What kind of drove you to do that?

00:01:32.959 --> 00:01:34.079
You know, it's it's interesting.

00:01:34.079 --> 00:01:38.719
I graduated high school and went in the Marine Corps with a 2.0 grade point average in high school.

00:01:38.719 --> 00:01:42.560
And uh the Marine Corps was probably the best thing that that happened to me.

00:01:42.560 --> 00:01:51.359
And my recruiter, the uh wonderful human being that he was, said, Yes, son, you can join the join the Marines and you can be an MP.

00:01:51.359 --> 00:01:56.719
Once you turn 19, you just fill out some forms and you can get all the college classes you want.

00:01:56.719 --> 00:02:01.760
So after being an infantryman, I did end up with one college class.

00:02:01.760 --> 00:02:12.080
But my father was born in 1908, had a sixth grade education, and and while we didn't have a a lot of wealth growing up, my mom and dad were together, and he was much older, obviously.

00:02:12.080 --> 00:02:15.759
And the most important thing for him was that we got to school and earned an education.

00:02:15.759 --> 00:02:17.520
And that just kind of stuck with me.

00:02:17.520 --> 00:02:23.680
But you know, the other thing is, you know, there's a big difference between getting an education and getting training.

00:02:23.680 --> 00:02:27.759
And one of the things that I found is I've always kind of been a problem finder.

00:02:27.759 --> 00:02:29.360
You know, where where's the issue?

00:02:29.360 --> 00:02:31.759
Quatsch brewing, how do we solve it?

00:02:31.759 --> 00:02:38.319
And just out of that curiosity, if I'd set in these classes and light bulbs would go off, especially in the I.O.

00:02:38.319 --> 00:02:42.159
psych and the business classes, we could really use this in law enforcement.

00:02:42.159 --> 00:02:47.759
But one of the problems we have in policing is if it wasn't done by cops for cops, we automatically dismiss it.

00:02:47.759 --> 00:03:02.159
And there's a lot of concepts in the book, and thanks for the mention on that, that John and I have taken these models and theories that have been very successful in other areas, and we've kind of reskinned them and modified them to fit in the law enforcement community.

00:03:02.159 --> 00:03:16.240
Because today, between AI and generational differences and the rapid speed at which people are getting promoted to sergeant and then lieutenant, the generational value over the work-life balance being different.

00:03:16.240 --> 00:03:19.199
You know, you and I came up and it was work, work, work.

00:03:19.199 --> 00:03:26.560
And overtime, as soon as we can get it, and we stand in the hallway and we shank people when the extra duty, off-duty details came out.

00:03:26.560 --> 00:03:28.319
But it's a different generation today.

00:03:28.319 --> 00:03:30.800
So there's so many things that are happening.

00:03:30.800 --> 00:03:38.400
And I think just my curiosity, the other advantage I had is I I retired early to go start an academic career.

00:03:38.400 --> 00:03:47.439
And I've been in, I've spent enough time as an academic, it also gave me an opportunity to leverage some of that for tuition remission and and and get the get that education.

00:03:47.439 --> 00:03:56.479
But I found myself, and this is for folks who are transitioning out of law enforcement, you know, I say it all the time, and I and I like to coach folks as they transition.

00:03:56.479 --> 00:04:06.719
You don't understand how valuable your skills are operating in law enforcement, where the consequences are high, decisions have to be made, and you can't kick these cans down the road.

00:04:06.719 --> 00:04:08.400
You gotta go, you gotta go.

00:04:08.400 --> 00:04:14.800
And the leadership principles of military and of law enforcement translate to any other discipline.

00:04:14.800 --> 00:04:18.399
You just got to learn what those what those disciplines are.

00:04:18.399 --> 00:04:22.959
So all of that stuff really, I think, to get back to your question.

00:04:22.959 --> 00:04:40.000
I think I had the opportunity, and and you know, after being born in high school and not doing that great, um, you know, my father's dream for my my brother and I is to earn an education and let it help us in our career is really I I valued that perspective.

00:04:40.000 --> 00:04:44.240
You know, he was a coal miner, you know, he lived to be 89 years old.

00:04:44.240 --> 00:04:47.519
But the most important message he has was education, education.

00:04:47.519 --> 00:04:51.120
And I hear all the time from cops, you know, getting a degree is not going to make me a better cop.

00:04:51.120 --> 00:04:52.319
But I say, you're absolutely right.

00:04:52.319 --> 00:04:54.079
It's not gonna make you a better cop.

00:04:54.079 --> 00:04:59.279
But getting a degree adds tools to your toolkit that you don't even realize you don't have yet.

00:04:59.279 --> 00:05:05.279
And I think that's the that's the takeaway, that's the the curiosity that I think folks need when they work on their degree.

00:05:05.519 --> 00:05:07.920
Yeah, it's so interesting because I have a similar story.

00:05:07.920 --> 00:05:13.680
I just I grew up in a household, uh, no, no one in my family's generation and ever got a bachelor's degree.

00:05:13.680 --> 00:05:18.560
And I just I can remember from as long as I can remember, you're going to college, you're going to college, you're going to college.

00:05:18.560 --> 00:05:26.079
You know, it could be a debate today whether you want to do your say that to your kids now because the landscape sort of changed on the workplace, but I it was just never an option.

00:05:26.079 --> 00:05:27.279
Just never an option.

00:05:27.279 --> 00:05:34.480
And um, and I that's even though I was well out of my parents' house and on the job, I think I just that was in the back of my mind.

00:05:34.480 --> 00:05:38.639
And so I'm when I decided to retire, my first default was I needed some more education.

00:05:38.639 --> 00:05:42.879
Don't know what that's supposed to be, but I got it in what I was interested in, which is of course leadership.

00:05:42.879 --> 00:05:44.879
And so you I think you're right.

00:05:44.879 --> 00:05:48.399
And I want to mention your book again, Law Enforcement Leadership, Management and Supervision.

00:05:48.399 --> 00:05:50.000
You can get it at all major bookstores.

00:05:50.000 --> 00:05:52.560
And I I called it the Bible of leadership to John.

00:05:52.560 --> 00:06:01.519
I think he kind of liked that, and I will it was no disrespect to our Lord Jesus Christ, but I just think it's so packed with so many valuable stuff, and I think it's so needed.

00:06:01.519 --> 00:06:12.480
And I think in the sea of leadership materials that's always out there that we could have a debate on whether it's actually working because of the state of law enforcement, this really barrels it down and it's very unique, and so I think it's very helpful.

00:06:12.480 --> 00:06:13.279
But you're right, John.

00:06:13.279 --> 00:06:21.040
It it does bring in a lot of the proven business models in leadership and business theory and business practices.

00:06:21.040 --> 00:06:23.839
And obviously, when I got my education, I discovered that.

00:06:23.839 --> 00:06:26.480
Do you see law enforcement a little bit resistant in that?

00:06:26.480 --> 00:06:28.399
And what's been what's been your experience?

00:06:28.639 --> 00:06:30.399
You know, and that that's a great question.

00:06:30.399 --> 00:06:42.000
So I'm a member of the Florida Police Chiefs Association, and for the last three or four years, they've invited me to come and do a day on organizational culture and organizational leadership issues for new chiefs and future chiefs.

00:06:42.000 --> 00:06:49.519
And there's some common themes that whether, and I and I my passion is training sergeants because they are the most important step along the way.

00:06:49.519 --> 00:06:51.120
That's where the rubber meets the road.

00:06:51.120 --> 00:06:58.720
But whether it's a new chief, a future chief, or a sergeant, the questions always come back to generational differences and dealing with difficult folks, right?

00:06:58.720 --> 00:07:10.319
So I had one uh future or new chief's class where we spent half the day down a rabbit hole talking about, well, you know, I came in from another agency and now the honeymoon period's over.

00:07:10.319 --> 00:07:19.040
It's you know, two or three months in, and I've got a lieutenant or a commander who didn't get promoted, who is just doing everything they can to backstab me.

00:07:19.040 --> 00:07:28.079
And, you know, the issue is with the recruiting and retention in particular, I always like to ask the question is all retention positive?

00:07:28.079 --> 00:07:32.800
And I usually get the the dog chased a car and caught it look, and they well, what do you mean?

00:07:32.800 --> 00:07:34.720
I said, let me ask you a story.

00:07:34.720 --> 00:07:36.639
Let's let's do my little genie test, right?

00:07:36.639 --> 00:07:44.800
You're walking down the beach, you find a genie's lamp, but it says Dollar General on the side, you pick it up and you rub it, and out pops the genie wearing a Dollar General vest.

00:07:44.800 --> 00:07:53.360
He says, Yes, I'm a genie, but you only get one wish, and your wish can only be in this area, and that is who in your agency could you snap?

00:07:53.360 --> 00:07:57.759
And they'd be gone from your agency right now, and your agency would be better off for it.

00:07:57.759 --> 00:08:25.759
And they usually think, and I've had everything from one to two, up to eight or ten of the of the toxic folks in the agency, whether they're they're the lazy patrol officer who doesn't do anything, or if it's a uh somebody in command staff who's undermining and just wreaking havoc down the line and being able to pull stuff, you know, that in the second edition of the book that we're working on, I've just added a whole new section on generational differences, along with some case studies on how to work it.

00:08:25.759 --> 00:08:39.120
But the bigger one was as I go look at the literature, and this was part of the frustration I had 20 years ago studying leadership, depending on the discipline and depending on the frame, there's no common definitions for supervision, leadership, and management.

00:08:39.120 --> 00:08:41.840
And that's one of the core things that we tried to do in the book.

00:08:41.840 --> 00:08:48.159
But there's no common definition on what a toxic employee is or a toxic boss is and what you should do about it.

00:08:48.159 --> 00:08:53.360
So framing some of that stuff specifically in a law enforcement context, I think can be helpful.

00:08:53.360 --> 00:08:59.120
And, you know, you mentioned in some of your tenets in your work, and that is it's that positive accountability.

00:08:59.120 --> 00:09:14.240
If I love you, if I care for you, as Jack Enter says, right, talking about um uh the wounds of a friend and how how hurtful it can be, but how important it is for us to hold one another accountable on the positive end.

00:09:14.240 --> 00:09:28.879
But if we don't shift today in policing to a culture and cultures of that positive accountability, that helping accountability, we got a much longer road to hoe in this recruiting, retention, leadership cycle than we anticipate.

00:09:29.440 --> 00:09:33.360
Yeah, I've I've often said that it's it's more about leadership than anything else.

00:09:33.360 --> 00:09:38.720
If you fix leadership, you're fixing your staffing, you're fixing your crime, you're fixing your retention.

00:09:38.720 --> 00:09:41.279
And I think, and this is what I'm afraid of.

00:09:41.279 --> 00:09:45.360
I mean, 30 years in the profession, there's plenty of people that's got more experience than me.

00:09:45.360 --> 00:09:50.000
But what I saw over and over again is we take the easy route of doctor to doctor.

00:09:50.000 --> 00:09:52.080
We let's throw some money at it and fix a problem.

00:09:52.080 --> 00:09:53.759
Let's hire this consultant to fix a problem.

00:09:53.759 --> 00:09:57.360
But the real work of leadership has to happen between those walls.

00:09:57.360 --> 00:09:58.879
What's your thoughts on that?

00:09:59.200 --> 00:10:01.360
So, great question.

00:10:01.360 --> 00:10:04.480
I've done a lot of a lot of research.

00:10:04.480 --> 00:10:08.240
Actually, I've spent the last 25 years researching recruiting and retention.

00:10:08.240 --> 00:10:11.200
So, back in the late 1990s, I had an opportunity.

00:10:11.200 --> 00:10:16.559
I'd gotten my master's degree in IOSYC, I was still full-time, and my chief was involved with the Florida Chiefs.

00:10:16.559 --> 00:10:23.600
And back then we were having a recruiting and retention crisis, which is a lot different than the one we're we're just now coming out of.

00:10:23.600 --> 00:10:30.240
But I spent God a year and a half working with hundreds of agencies um looking at that problem.

00:10:30.240 --> 00:10:35.759
And then 20 years later, I looked at the same problem for the Florida Police Chiefs again.

00:10:35.759 --> 00:10:38.799
And I'm kind of like the board from Star Trek.

00:10:38.799 --> 00:10:42.639
I like to assimilate all the information I can get from wherever I can get it.

00:10:42.639 --> 00:10:45.120
And in doing that, it became evident to me.

00:10:45.120 --> 00:10:50.080
My old keep it simple, stupid mantra from the Marine Corps paid me a lot of dividends.

00:10:50.080 --> 00:10:53.360
We recruit less when we retain more.

00:10:53.360 --> 00:10:59.840
The absolute key to retention is good leadership, and the key to developing leadership is the culture.

00:10:59.840 --> 00:11:01.279
I'll give you a good example.

00:11:01.279 --> 00:11:08.240
Texas Commission on Law Enforcement, they've honored me the last few years, and I go out and speak, and they'll have six, seven, eight hundred folks come.

00:11:08.240 --> 00:11:10.639
So I'll do a session two or three times.

00:11:10.639 --> 00:11:17.039
And every time I'd ask, how many of you are not having retention problems or recruiting problems?

00:11:17.039 --> 00:11:25.759
And only two or three hands out of a couple hundred folks would come up and I would say, Well, folks, either they're completely full of crap or they're doing something right.

00:11:25.759 --> 00:11:29.919
Is there anybody in their region that can vouch vouch if they're full of crap or doing it right?

00:11:29.919 --> 00:11:32.480
And fortunately, so far everybody's vouched for them.

00:11:32.480 --> 00:11:44.159
But when you when you drill down and you question, the bottom line is it happens naturally because the culture has developed and is maintained to develop leaders, which means you're developing followers.

00:11:44.159 --> 00:11:52.399
You're treating FTOs as leader coaches, giving them that first leadership opportunity, developing into the corporals and then into the sergeants.

00:11:52.399 --> 00:11:58.639
And when you get into that developmental pipeline, I call it the law enforcement leadership pipeline, those things just happen.

00:11:58.639 --> 00:12:04.080
And like you said, you can you can't bring you can't bring in a consultant in this to fix your problem.

00:12:04.080 --> 00:12:14.080
You can bring in somebody to give you some advice on the steps that you need to take in your agency so you can make your agency better, but it's gotta be, it's gotta be culturally anchored.

00:12:14.480 --> 00:12:29.039
Yeah, and I I'm sure you found this out, and I want to just sort of uh flip the page a little bit here on research and leadership because I know when I was doing my studies, I found a lack of actual peer-reviewed research on law enforcement leadership.

00:12:29.039 --> 00:12:39.360
Meanwhile, there's plenty of it in other industries, and it uh I guess I'm curious of kind of the genesis of that and why you see that happening.

00:12:39.360 --> 00:12:40.960
Is it is it just our culture?

00:12:40.960 --> 00:12:46.720
Do we think that we're so different than everybody else that we don't have to do what other people do?

00:12:46.720 --> 00:12:53.759
Um, because obviously leadership is not that complicated, but you have to sort of know what works and what doesn't work to have success.

00:12:53.759 --> 00:12:55.679
And so I just want to know your thoughts on that.

00:12:56.000 --> 00:12:59.200
So I and I talk to Chiefs about this a lot.

00:12:59.200 --> 00:13:03.919
I think it's due in great part to a lack of adversarial collaboration.

00:13:03.919 --> 00:13:12.320
And what I mean by that is, you know, and and I and I've lived in this in this environment of an academia now for 20 years.

00:13:12.320 --> 00:13:19.519
Academia and research leans left, and cop's conservative and leaning right.

00:13:19.519 --> 00:13:32.159
And unfortunately, especially in today's environment, it's becoming more and more challenging to find somebody who sees things differently than you to sit down and have a conversation and collaboratively go look at it so that you can account for it.

00:13:32.159 --> 00:13:39.919
And I'll give you a good example in the law enforcement leadership, uh, and even in like use of force that I know you that you're a fan of, right?

00:13:39.919 --> 00:13:45.200
Most of this stuff is done through a bias lens that it's almost confirmation bias.

00:13:45.200 --> 00:13:47.600
And they and they don't look beyond those stats.

00:13:47.600 --> 00:13:59.360
And the bigger problem is for folks that are doing research in criminal justice, is they don't engage with practitioners to help them put it out, a practitioner's interpretation on what that data looks like.

00:13:59.360 --> 00:14:01.039
And I'll give you a perfect example.

00:14:01.039 --> 00:14:06.559
I spent some years helping the FBI with their Indian Country Crimes Unit looking at sexual assaults.

00:14:06.559 --> 00:14:16.799
The the supervisor for that unit got called to Congress and got scalded by Congress folks saying, why are you allowing white folks to go on reservations and rape these Native American women?

00:14:16.799 --> 00:14:18.960
And they're like, What are you talking about?

00:14:18.960 --> 00:14:34.720
Well, what had happened was they had gotten a study that was based on census data where people self-reported as being Native American rather than registered tribal members living on tribal lands where the FBI actually had jurisdiction, right?

00:14:34.720 --> 00:14:40.879
So once we unround that and we discovered it was overgeneralized, we're able to do that.

00:14:40.879 --> 00:14:46.240
But until a cop stepped in and said, well, hang on a minute, let's check, let's challenge some assumptions here.

00:14:46.240 --> 00:14:59.440
And we ended up spending years actually looking at sexual assault in the Indian country because it's it shocked me up until the last few recent years, the Indian country, the tribal police didn't have to report crimes and uniform crime report.

00:14:59.440 --> 00:15:00.399
There was no data.

00:15:00.399 --> 00:15:02.159
So sometimes it's a lack of data.

00:15:02.159 --> 00:15:06.080
The other, the other part of the equation, I'll give you a good example with use of force.

00:15:06.080 --> 00:15:09.279
All the prevailing literature says it's based on race.

00:15:09.279 --> 00:15:13.440
And that's because the research questions were framed based on race.

00:15:13.440 --> 00:15:23.200
But there was a study, an international study, a guy named Cogine and Associates looked at it, and what they found is that it's actually subject resistance, not race.

00:15:23.200 --> 00:15:38.159
But if you looked at, if you did a, if you did, if you go to a listed or you go to your into your library, you're going to find 10 articles that say it's based on race, and only one voice that says it's based on subject resistance, and it just it just gets overshadowed.

00:15:38.159 --> 00:15:43.919
So the leadership stuff in law enforcement, I will say this Jeremy Wilson with a police staffing observatory.

00:15:43.919 --> 00:15:45.519
Do you do you know Jeremy?

00:15:45.519 --> 00:15:46.480
Yeah, yeah.

00:15:46.480 --> 00:15:59.200
Um, they had a study from 2023 that actually took about 95 studies on police retention, specifically to police, and they did a meta-analysis on that, and it's a great piece.

00:15:59.200 --> 00:16:11.519
But the problem is if if I'm a if I'm a grad student in policing, or if I'm a police chief or a captain, or I'm at the National Academy, I'm trying to find it, it doesn't pop up at the top of the list because it it just doesn't get hit on it.

00:16:11.519 --> 00:16:15.039
So if you don't network well, you can't find the good research.

00:16:15.039 --> 00:16:23.840
And the reality is with behavioral research, good research is going to be able to account for 18 to 22 percent of the behavioral variants.

00:16:23.840 --> 00:16:30.639
That's that's a that's an A plus report, meaning you know, 82 to 78 percent is something else.

00:16:30.639 --> 00:16:34.639
And that's just that's the best that we can do.

00:16:34.639 --> 00:16:42.159
And if we're not engaging in a collaborative way with the researchers, a lot of the research just points us in the wrong damn direction.

00:16:42.399 --> 00:16:52.399
Yeah, and I want to just sort of uh make sure our audience is aware of this discussion because this is sort of the game that's played, is uh you talk about left and right narrative.

00:16:52.399 --> 00:17:04.319
It's very easy from a left narrative to get peer peer published, very easy, very difficult if you have a different narrative to get peer published because there's extreme bias in academia, which is kind of blows my mind, but it's just the truth.

00:17:04.319 --> 00:17:09.519
Uh, you can go back a few years during all the COVID stuff and see that bias and see what some of the journals were doing.

00:17:09.519 --> 00:17:16.160
And so, for instance, I'll give you and I'll kind of parlay on what you just said, is is everybody talks about systematic racism, systematic racism.

00:17:16.160 --> 00:17:19.119
African Americans are shot at 2.5 times their rate of this and that.

00:17:19.119 --> 00:17:22.319
Well, what the and you'll find a ton of research on that, but it's all flawed.

00:17:22.319 --> 00:17:24.559
Every bit of it's flawed because they're taking the U.S.

00:17:24.559 --> 00:17:27.359
census and comparing that to police activity.

00:17:27.359 --> 00:17:28.400
Where even Dr.

00:17:28.400 --> 00:17:33.119
Robert Engel, who's attempted to make some sense of this, will say that's completely flawed.

00:17:33.119 --> 00:17:38.640
If you're going to look at police activity, you have to look at criminality because that's who we interact with.

00:17:38.640 --> 00:17:42.799
And so when you look at criminality across the board, you don't see that 2.5.

00:17:42.799 --> 00:17:44.799
That's why academia won't talk about that.

00:17:44.799 --> 00:17:47.440
And there's not hardly any studies that will parse that.

00:17:47.440 --> 00:17:50.960
You'll see a ton that parse this, and it's so simplified, it's so ridiculous.

00:17:50.960 --> 00:17:52.000
People need to have a brain.

00:17:52.000 --> 00:18:00.960
But what they're able to do by getting some a peer-reviewed journal from the left side to print is they'll say, This is science, this is the science, the science is set, you know, all this nonsense.

00:18:00.960 --> 00:18:09.359
And so we need more academia and law enforcement, we need people purporting this truth because uh it really is watered down, and so that's that's an excellent point.

00:18:09.359 --> 00:18:13.599
Now, you talk about theories, a lot of leadership in the book, Doctor.

00:18:13.599 --> 00:18:14.640
A lot of theories.

00:18:14.640 --> 00:18:22.400
Now, I think I know the answer to this, but uh, is there any particular theories you want to hone in on for law enforcement specifically to kind of help our audience?

00:18:22.640 --> 00:18:31.759
If I had to boil that book down to one theory that I would tell a new sergeant or a new chief to learn and live, then it would be the leader member exchange.

00:18:31.759 --> 00:18:52.720
And it is basically this your relationship with all the people in your care, whether you're the sergeant and you have a bunch of officers or deputies, whether you're a lieutenant and you have a bunch of sergeants, or if you're a chief and you have a command staff that includes civilians, the time that you spend with them and their development is the most valuable resource that you have.

00:18:52.720 --> 00:18:54.319
And you have to be mindful.

00:18:54.319 --> 00:18:59.599
And, you know, I've got a bunch of kids and some of them keep score, but I always put it to you, like put them like this.

00:18:59.599 --> 00:19:01.519
And I like to pick on the SWAT guys.

00:19:01.519 --> 00:19:09.279
You know, it's common at three in the morning, four in the morning on a on a weekend, you're going to go to Denny's, you're going to go to the Waffle House, you're going to go somewhere and eat.

00:19:09.279 --> 00:19:15.359
And it's natural to say, hey, you know, we went to the academy together, we're on a SWAT team together, let's go, let's go get some bacon and eggs.

00:19:15.359 --> 00:19:22.240
But if you've got seven other officers and they're seeing you go to lunch with the same person all the time, you may not have any intent.

00:19:22.240 --> 00:19:25.839
And I've had sergeants go, oh crap, I never thought about it that way.

00:19:25.839 --> 00:19:28.720
But you have to give the same love and attention to everybody.

00:19:28.720 --> 00:19:31.279
You have to be mindful of it, and you have to realize it.

00:19:31.279 --> 00:19:32.559
They keep score.

00:19:32.559 --> 00:19:38.880
So if you've had lunch with your SWAT buddies the last couple of nights, go have lunch, go have breakfast with somebody else.

00:19:38.880 --> 00:19:43.039
You have to spend that time, whether it's car to car, you got to get to know them.

00:19:43.039 --> 00:19:50.319
And that leader member exchange theory is critical because to do it right, you're going to build rapport, you're going to communicate, you're going to get the trust.

00:19:50.319 --> 00:20:04.960
Once you get that rapport and trust, you get into what I call the leadership pathfinding, which is my model of leadership from that whole domain of stuff that if you can If you can communicate well to build rapport and build trust, everything else takes care of itself.

00:20:04.960 --> 00:20:17.440
And if the chiefs will do that, and the commanders and the lieutenants and the sergeants and the FTOs with their trainees, this is what builds that culture that sustains that development without even having to really think about it.

00:20:17.680 --> 00:20:20.880
Yeah, culture and trust is such the key, is such a huge factor.

00:20:20.880 --> 00:20:26.559
And I think that's probably, I'll just give you my opinion, I think that's probably one of the failures that's causing a lot of issues in leadership.

00:20:26.559 --> 00:20:30.640
Because if you don't have, you don't build that trust, you hence don't build the culture, you have a problem.

00:20:30.640 --> 00:20:37.279
And what a lot of leaders don't understand, and I'll mention it again, I mention it all the time, which is quit with your I have an open door policy nonsense.

00:20:37.279 --> 00:20:38.960
No one's coming into your door.

00:20:38.960 --> 00:20:48.799
You're gonna have to go to their door, you're gonna have to spend moments with people, time with people, even people you don't necessarily like on a personal level, because they're never going to trust you unless you trust them.

00:20:48.799 --> 00:20:50.799
And that's really the key, is it not?

00:20:50.960 --> 00:20:53.519
You know, it's the old book management by walking around.

00:20:53.519 --> 00:20:59.519
And you know, Jack Enter, he he challenges folks, make a list of all your people every week.

00:20:59.519 --> 00:21:06.480
You go to them, whether it's car to car with them, whether it's in their cubicle, their office, and it's just five, ten minutes.

00:21:06.480 --> 00:21:07.519
How's it going?

00:21:07.519 --> 00:21:08.480
How are you doing?

00:21:08.480 --> 00:21:09.519
How's your class going?

00:21:09.519 --> 00:21:10.480
How's your sick mom?

00:21:10.480 --> 00:21:11.519
How's your kid doing?

00:21:11.519 --> 00:21:22.480
So uh John and I and a couple other fellows, we did an assessment for an organization that was a sheriff's office here in central, south central Florida, excuse me, and we're kind of doing a cultural assessment.

00:21:22.480 --> 00:21:27.920
And the problem they're having is they are paid so less than the coat.

00:21:27.920 --> 00:21:30.160
We call it the coastal payward, right?

00:21:30.160 --> 00:21:36.960
Somebody can go 30 minutes to the coast and make $15,000, $20,000 more a year, no matter how happy they may be.

00:21:36.960 --> 00:21:38.480
That's life-changing money.

00:21:38.480 --> 00:21:42.400
And there was a young deputy about three years, she said, you know, I will never leave this place.

00:21:42.400 --> 00:21:43.759
I don't care what the pay is.

00:21:43.759 --> 00:21:44.880
I said, well, tell me more.

00:21:44.880 --> 00:21:55.920
She said, I can walk down the hall and the patrol captain or the sheriff will see me and ask me about my daughter, or say, Hey, how did that test, how did that test work out in your grad class?

00:21:55.920 --> 00:22:01.279
She said, they know who I am and they care about me, and there is no amount of money that will replace that.

00:22:01.279 --> 00:22:15.359
Now, I've also talked to deputies who had been there, some cases eight, 10 years, that were going to a coastal agency because they said, I know I'm giving up a good place to be, but 18 grand a year, that's life-changing money for my family.

00:22:15.359 --> 00:22:22.240
So when you when you look at those relationships, and the other thing is communications is a growing challenge.

00:22:22.240 --> 00:22:23.359
It's always been a challenge.

00:22:23.359 --> 00:22:31.119
I remember back in the day we don't manage by memo, now it's don't manage by email, and now it's you know, you get inundated with with communications.

00:22:31.119 --> 00:22:41.680
But one of the nice things about it is when cops trust each other and they trust their boss, and the boss says, I need you to go do this on this perimeter, there's no questions, there's no why, there's no dancing around it.

00:22:41.680 --> 00:22:44.640
They simply trust you that you know what you're doing and they're going to do it.

00:22:44.640 --> 00:22:56.480
They may ask you later, especially if they're Gen Z why, but trust is the ultimate mediator, moderator, and the and the the essential aspect of having a good organization.

00:22:56.799 --> 00:23:06.000
Yeah, you mentioned communication, and and obviously, uh Doctor, you're an expert in behavioral science and and and all the communication aspects around that.

00:23:06.000 --> 00:23:08.079
I think email is probably done.

00:23:08.079 --> 00:23:10.079
I'll put email up there with Taser.

00:23:10.079 --> 00:23:16.079
Taser, I think, has hurt so many of our uh agencies because it's there's an over reliance that's put people in danger.

00:23:16.079 --> 00:23:23.839
There's a reason why we're at all-time high with officer assaults, even though the violent crime rate's dipping, that goes against everything traditional we've ever seen.

00:23:23.839 --> 00:23:31.200
And I think it's because we're over relying on some less lethal tools when clearly there's there's there's times you should not have a less lethal tool out.

00:23:31.200 --> 00:23:34.880
But I think I would say um it's almost the same way with email.

00:23:34.880 --> 00:23:40.960
I think email has really uh hurt us from a communication level because there's no balance there.

00:23:40.960 --> 00:23:43.200
I can tell you right now, people aren't reading email.

00:23:43.200 --> 00:23:48.720
I part of my dissertation was evaluating that, and literally I was told we don't look at email, we don't read email.

00:23:48.799 --> 00:23:52.240
So if it's something or read beyond the first five words, yep.

00:23:52.480 --> 00:23:57.839
Yeah, and and I know by the time I'd retired, I mean, I was getting two, three hundred emails a day.

00:23:57.839 --> 00:24:00.960
I mean, so that's probably only getting worse and worse and worse.

00:24:00.960 --> 00:24:05.839
And so if you don't want something to be read and it's not important, use email, but you've got to use other means.

00:24:05.839 --> 00:24:09.039
I just want to know your thoughts on communication and the power they can lead in leadership.

00:24:09.279 --> 00:24:24.000
Well, and and the interesting thing is I I talk about this, especially in the new chiefs class, and especially with some of the smaller or mid-sized agencies, they've gone to apps like like uh Slack and others, and there's and there's there's shortfalls to that.

00:24:24.000 --> 00:24:26.480
But having apps, and there's some secure ones out there.

00:24:26.480 --> 00:24:35.119
A good friend of mine, Nikki, she she runs an organization that they have that secured, but you know, there's too much noise in our emails, right?

00:24:35.119 --> 00:24:39.599
HR sending this, and there's just party, and there's just everybody's getting this email.

00:24:39.599 --> 00:24:40.480
I don't know why.

00:24:40.480 --> 00:24:51.200
But if you have an app that basically, here's my leadership team, this is stuff you need to know, and you get a notification once or twice a day, that's something you're gonna pay attention to, as long as it doesn't get overused.

00:24:51.200 --> 00:25:00.640
But we've we've got to leverage technology not to do more information blast, but to make the information that's critical get to folks in a in a timely way.

00:25:00.640 --> 00:25:02.160
It's interesting, we're talking about this.

00:25:02.160 --> 00:25:13.200
I just wrote a case study for the book, and it was a lieutenant who sent out a message um about um doing some close patrols because there's been a lot of uh autoburglaries.

00:25:13.200 --> 00:25:21.680
And one sergeant skimmed it and told his his crew that we're getting, you know, we're getting crap from administration because these are happening.

00:25:21.680 --> 00:25:34.559
Another sergeant actually read it, and then when the lieutenant went back a week later to look at the the cost for service and and the report logs, one shift did great, one one did not, and it came back to that lack of communication.

00:25:34.559 --> 00:25:38.319
So there is no replacement for face-to-face communication.

00:25:38.319 --> 00:25:38.799
Yeah.

00:25:38.799 --> 00:25:50.559
It doesn't always it doesn't always work, but the challenge is, especially with generational differences, the newer generations would rather text, even if they're sitting right next to each other, than have the conversation.

00:25:50.559 --> 00:25:57.920
And in doing so, especially when you put the cost cross-generational differences in, it just adds another layer of complexity to communication.

00:25:58.240 --> 00:26:00.079
If you're just now joining us, we're talking to Dr.

00:26:00.079 --> 00:26:00.960
Marshall Jones.

00:26:00.960 --> 00:26:04.640
He's the co-author of Law Enforcement Leadership, Management, and Supervision.

00:26:04.640 --> 00:26:06.480
Get this book, however, you have to do it.

00:26:06.480 --> 00:26:08.079
All major booksellers have it.

00:26:08.079 --> 00:26:10.160
I call it the Bible leadership because I believe it.

00:26:10.160 --> 00:26:11.759
And I've written leadership books, trust me.

00:26:11.759 --> 00:26:12.400
Get this one.

00:26:12.400 --> 00:26:14.079
This will help you out in every aspect.

00:26:14.079 --> 00:26:15.440
I wish I had it.

00:26:15.440 --> 00:26:26.240
And uh, Doctor, I think I just wanted to get a resounding answer from you because there's probably more challenges today in law enforcement than ever before.

00:26:26.240 --> 00:26:35.440
And I know every generation said that, but I think truly we're living in a state in a time where we see chiefs having to answer to everything but the mission.

00:26:35.440 --> 00:26:36.880
They have to answer everything but the crime.

00:26:36.880 --> 00:26:41.599
In fact, I usually challenge people in my seminars find me a chief that's been fired for high crime.

00:26:41.599 --> 00:26:43.359
Find me a chief that's failed the mission.

00:26:43.359 --> 00:26:52.000
You know, you'll have chiefs fired for other things, but you'll be hard-pressed to find a chief that gets actually gets fired for fulfilling the for not fulfilling the mission, which is high crime.

00:26:52.000 --> 00:26:54.960
So we're sort of off the very basics of what we do.

00:26:54.960 --> 00:26:56.480
Where do you see this going?

00:26:56.480 --> 00:26:59.680
I know you're part of some futuristic stuff and you're really on the cutting edge of that.

00:26:59.680 --> 00:27:04.160
Where do you see law enforcement in the next 10, 20 years with what's going on right now?

00:27:06.400 --> 00:27:13.200
I think our biggest, our biggest threat in law enforcement right now is something that most people don't think about, and that's AI.

00:27:13.200 --> 00:27:15.759
And uh a colleague of mine, Dr.

00:27:15.759 --> 00:27:25.200
Brandon May, we started uh Center for AI and policing, and you've got all the vendors out there that are that are helping solve the critical problem that's report writing.

00:27:25.200 --> 00:27:27.839
We're many agencies are working short.

00:27:27.839 --> 00:27:29.599
The report writing issue.

00:27:29.599 --> 00:27:35.920
We all know the history of getting officers to review the reports and the supervisors to check them off, and then you've got the kickbacks.

00:27:35.920 --> 00:27:37.759
But here's here's the real problem.

00:27:37.759 --> 00:27:47.519
And and I was sitting at South Carolina Chiefs listening to the retired lieutenant from SLED who worked the Murdoch case, and he was the lieutenant in charge of digital forensics, and a light bulb went off.

00:27:47.519 --> 00:28:06.400
He said, I prepared for over a year to go testify because the defense had three experts on digital forensics, and everything from the car data to the phone data and everything in between, I had to become an expert so I could explain to the jury in a way that they'd understand what we did and how we did it.

00:28:06.400 --> 00:28:08.720
Otherwise, they're gonna chew me up and spit me out.

00:28:08.720 --> 00:28:17.759
Our threat in law enforcement is there's more and more technology that'll take our body cam or take other things out of CAD and generate a report for us.

00:28:17.759 --> 00:28:36.799
If we as law enforcement can understand how LLMs work, how what AI really is, and it's not artificial intelligence, we're gonna get on the stand, we're gonna have a critical case where some poor child was molested, and because a defense attorney learns to say, Is this report true and complete?

00:28:36.799 --> 00:28:38.000
Did you use AI?

00:28:38.000 --> 00:28:39.200
Well, how did it work?

00:28:39.200 --> 00:28:40.240
How did you use it?

00:28:40.240 --> 00:28:42.240
They're gonna chew them up and spit them out.

00:28:42.240 --> 00:28:52.640
There is no cop that I've ever worked with that wants not only that embarrassment, but to know that because they were taking a shortcut and they were lazy shits, that a that a case was messed up.

00:28:52.640 --> 00:29:00.559
And I was recently talking to a chief deputy who said, Yeah, but Marshall, we've all gone to court and you know, we've used our case reports, and even if there was an error, we could talk about it.

00:29:00.559 --> 00:29:03.680
I said, that's true, but you are the generator of that.

00:29:03.680 --> 00:29:05.119
You didn't shortcut it.

00:29:05.119 --> 00:29:15.200
You could talk about it, and there's no reasonable doubt that you shortchanged this report with AI, because the problem is AI will anticipate what the words should be.

00:29:15.200 --> 00:29:17.119
It will make crap up.

00:29:17.119 --> 00:29:25.519
And in our training for this, I say you've got to treat AI like it's a very savvy suspect in an interview room for murder, the high consequence.

00:29:25.519 --> 00:29:38.880
They're gonna give you nine-tenths truths, but the 10% that's not is going to kill your case and it lies, and you have to triangulate and you have to verify everything because it will lull you into a false sense of security.

00:29:38.880 --> 00:29:40.319
And and you you add that.

00:29:40.319 --> 00:29:54.799
And one of the biggest frustrations I had when I was a sergeant, which I still think mid-night shift sergeants, the best job on the planet, is there was always those officers who waited to the last minute to give you reports that were crap, and then you had to spend all that time reviewing reports.

00:29:54.799 --> 00:29:59.920
At the at the other side of that equation, is we had those officers that we knew wrote good reports.

00:29:59.920 --> 00:30:28.160
Well, the problem now is all of them are gonna look good, which means we got to read them all, and we gotta we gotta read them for attention to detail because I I predict this within the next 18 months, there's gonna be a high-profile case where a bad guy walks because a cop gets wrapped around the applicable by a good defense attorney on their AI use, and it's gonna send a shockwave through our profession and to vendors that we have got to tighten up how we're using AI.

00:30:28.160 --> 00:30:35.279
And I think there are wonderful advantages to AI, but they're not the things that we're capitalizing on right now.

00:30:35.279 --> 00:30:36.640
And that and that scares me.

00:30:36.640 --> 00:30:42.559
The thing that scares me more is the younger generations, the Gen Z folks, they're native to this.

00:30:42.559 --> 00:30:47.759
They're using AI for their reports, whether we know it or not, or whether we have an agency policy or not.

00:30:47.759 --> 00:30:53.279
The decision makers, the older generations, are still trying to figure out what AI is.

00:30:53.279 --> 00:31:07.039
And if we don't infuse once an influence with vendors to make sure they're helping us protect against having failed cases, we're we're that's the kind of things that if we're going to get fired for doing things wrong, that would be one of them.

00:31:07.279 --> 00:31:08.319
Can you imagine this one?

00:31:08.319 --> 00:31:18.400
And I can see this coming because just like you, I have college students and you run them through the AI detection software, and that defense attorney asks that cop, Did you write this using AI?

00:31:18.400 --> 00:31:25.519
And maybe they don't recognize the software, or maybe they don't exactly tell the truth, and they say no, and he pops up that AI detection.

00:31:25.519 --> 00:31:28.799
I mean, can you that is not gonna, it's not gonna be good.

00:31:28.799 --> 00:31:29.920
I I totally agree with you.

00:31:29.920 --> 00:31:38.720
And you're you're one of the few that's that is talking about in this aspect because we're running this thing like a shiny flavor of the year, and we're running hard and heavy, and it's going to bite us.

00:31:38.720 --> 00:31:39.920
You're absolutely right.

00:31:39.920 --> 00:31:42.960
Uh, man, phenomenal stuff, uh, Doctor.

00:31:42.960 --> 00:31:44.480
I I I mean, we could go on and on.

00:31:44.480 --> 00:31:46.960
And so, man, I can't thank you enough for being here.

00:31:46.960 --> 00:31:49.039
How do people reach out to you?

00:31:49.039 --> 00:31:55.759
Uh, obviously, you and uh John and your book is a knowledge of wealth that they're gonna want to reach out to you.

00:31:55.759 --> 00:31:58.319
How do they reach out to you and and uh contact you?

00:31:58.559 --> 00:32:01.839
So um I do a lot of work through the Police Leadership Institute.

00:32:01.839 --> 00:32:05.680
And you can go to PLI.network or police leadershipinstitute.com.

00:32:05.680 --> 00:32:06.960
You can reach me that way.

00:32:06.960 --> 00:32:09.200
Uh, I'll be glad to give you my my cell phone.

00:32:09.200 --> 00:32:11.839
If folks can reach out to me directly, I'm good with that.

00:32:11.839 --> 00:32:18.559
Um, you know, I and I'm happy to talk with agencies, whether you're sergeant or chief, anything in between.

00:32:18.559 --> 00:32:23.839
If you're having a problem and you just need to bounce it off somebody that's not in your immediate circle, give me a call.

00:32:23.839 --> 00:32:24.880
I'm glad to talk about that.

00:32:24.880 --> 00:32:27.359
I learned so much in talking about those things.

00:32:27.359 --> 00:32:29.039
I did want to Travis share one thing.

00:32:29.039 --> 00:32:39.519
Jerry Ratcliffe up at UPenn, he does a lot of research with actual data looking at the race crime issue, and he actually parses this out, parses it out the right way.

00:32:39.519 --> 00:32:41.680
Have you seen any of his research?

00:32:41.680 --> 00:32:46.079
Yeah, you know, uh he's he's one of the few bold out there doing it.

00:32:46.079 --> 00:32:55.279
He is, and you know, when and here's here's the thing I I talk to my students about because I go there with the race and crime issue because everybody's afraid to talk about it.

00:32:55.279 --> 00:32:59.200
And until we get to that onion underneath the race, we're never going to solve it.

00:32:59.200 --> 00:33:01.200
And I really believe it's social capital.

00:33:01.200 --> 00:33:04.720
But the issue is here's what's missing in that argument.

00:33:04.720 --> 00:33:13.119
If violent crime is intra-racial and it's it's in this case, African Americans victimizing African Americans.

00:33:13.279 --> 00:33:14.640
Yeah, about 90% plus.

00:33:14.880 --> 00:33:21.519
And then, well, why is there an argument against law enforcement addressing that crime?

00:33:21.519 --> 00:33:23.279
Why don't the victims matter?

00:33:23.279 --> 00:33:37.279
And when you frame it that way, even with folks who want to buy into all the the literature-backed type of it's all systemic racism, the argument dissipates itself just by making folks use some logic.

00:33:37.519 --> 00:33:50.079
Yeah, the in the media section in our courageous leadership class, we actually that's exactly what we hone in on when it whether it's proactive policing or over policing or all these terminologies people have made up and thrown at law enforcement for actually trying to fulfill our mission.

00:33:50.079 --> 00:33:53.119
Is it so you don't want us to help out African-American victims?

00:33:53.119 --> 00:33:57.440
You don't want us stopping that crime, but stopping crime in the suburbs is okay.

00:33:57.440 --> 00:34:02.559
And leaders have got to start that, you know, leaders have got to have that language, they've got to have that conversation.

00:34:02.559 --> 00:34:05.519
I will tell you, you you mentioned something very important.

00:34:05.519 --> 00:34:10.719
We can't even talk about this issue, more or less solve this issue.

00:34:10.719 --> 00:34:13.199
I open up my seminar and I'll do it tomorrow.

00:34:13.199 --> 00:34:19.440
I open up my seminar with uh literally a warning.

00:34:19.440 --> 00:34:22.400
You're all adults, we're about to talk about some adult stuff.

00:34:22.400 --> 00:34:30.159
Yeah, I mean, they people are scared to death to even talk about it because we're letting everybody else talk about it, which is why we're in the position we're in.

00:34:30.719 --> 00:34:37.599
You know, I I tell Chiefs when it comes to somebody using research against you, here is the absolute truth of it.

00:34:37.599 --> 00:34:45.360
The the the theoretical statistical models that are used assume equal distribution.

00:34:45.360 --> 00:35:01.840
And because that equal distribution is assumed, that's why all the stats, unless folks like Jerry Ratkiff's work that actually parse that out and look at it more concisely, when you just look at the raw stats with a false lens of equal distribution, it's messed up.

00:35:01.840 --> 00:35:04.159
We don't live equally distributed.

00:35:04.159 --> 00:35:18.400
There's differences between preferences when it comes to educational attainment, social capital, host of other things, that until we talk about fixing that stuff, the race thing is just going to be it's just gonna be a red herring for the problems that are really facing our communities.

00:35:18.559 --> 00:35:26.639
Yeah, if we were if we were to take a lens and look at the world like this, well, NHL is obviously racist, the NBA is obviously racist, and I don't know what the MLB is.

00:35:26.639 --> 00:35:28.320
So, yeah, nothing is even like that.

00:35:28.320 --> 00:35:30.880
We don't live in this sort of fantasy land.

00:35:30.880 --> 00:35:32.159
And I'm glad uh Dr.

00:35:32.159 --> 00:35:35.280
Ratcliffe and others and a few others like yourself are talking about it.

00:35:35.280 --> 00:35:36.400
So uh Dr.

00:35:36.400 --> 00:35:37.920
Jones, thank you so much for being here.

00:35:37.920 --> 00:35:38.880
I mean, what a pleasure.

00:35:38.880 --> 00:35:41.280
I know our audience is gonna love this engagement.

00:35:41.280 --> 00:35:43.679
Um, can't thank you enough.

00:35:43.679 --> 00:35:45.039
It was my pleasure.

00:35:45.039 --> 00:35:45.760
Anytime.

00:35:45.760 --> 00:35:48.800
And if you've been watching or you've been listening, thank you for being here.

00:35:48.800 --> 00:35:49.679
Thank you for your time.

00:35:49.679 --> 00:35:52.960
And just remember lead on and stay courageous.

00:35:54.559 --> 00:35:58.079
Thank you for listening to Courageous Leadership with Travis Yates.

00:35:58.079 --> 00:36:03.119
We invite you to join other courageous leaders at TravisYates.org.