Transcript
WEBVTT
00:00:01.679 --> 00:00:11.039
Welcome to Courageous Leadership with Travis Gates, where leaders find the insights, advice, and encouragement they need to lead courageously.
00:00:12.000 --> 00:00:20.960
I've waited a few weeks to record this episode because quite frankly, I was so upset.
00:00:20.960 --> 00:00:22.480
I knew I needed to wait.
00:00:22.480 --> 00:00:34.960
I actually wrote an article about this, and it set in draft mode for a couple of weeks because the first draft, certainly I would have been sued for defamation, even though everything I said was true.
00:00:34.960 --> 00:00:38.399
But the cowards I'm about to talk about, that's how they operate.
00:00:38.399 --> 00:00:52.880
But it's something that I think anyone in the leadership space, anyone that wants to learn about leadership, especially in law enforcement, you need to understand what is going on, not only in this specific incident, but nationwide.
00:00:52.880 --> 00:01:01.119
Now, the accompanying article here uh is on my Substack, courageouspoliceleader.com.
00:01:01.119 --> 00:01:05.040
And um you don't have to remember that domain.
00:01:05.040 --> 00:01:10.719
If you go to Travisyage.org and you see articles, that leads over to all those articles.
00:01:10.719 --> 00:01:16.159
And you can subscribe there on Substack and you get these articles sent to you automatically.
00:01:16.159 --> 00:01:20.159
It kind of keeps me from spamming everybody with emails and things like that.
00:01:20.159 --> 00:01:21.519
So it's been really helpful.
00:01:21.519 --> 00:01:25.359
We have several thousand people that follow that article, those articles.
00:01:25.359 --> 00:01:30.480
And this latest article is called Hiding Behind a Suit and Robe.
00:01:30.480 --> 00:01:34.879
And I wanted to just sort of verbally not just read the article, but kind of maybe give you some insights.
00:01:34.879 --> 00:01:37.840
The article didn't go into and the background of it.
00:01:37.840 --> 00:01:41.040
So this started almost a year ago.
00:01:41.040 --> 00:01:55.599
I was contacted by an attorney out of Omaha, Nebraska, and there was a deputy that had been involved in a deadly force incident, and he had been prosecuted by the district attorney.
00:01:55.599 --> 00:02:04.159
I'm gonna give you the quick foundation of this prosecution because, quite frankly, uh that would take hours to just go into details about what actually happened.
00:02:04.159 --> 00:02:10.719
But essentially what happened was this deputy had had contact with a suspect a couple weeks prior to this incident.
00:02:10.719 --> 00:02:13.120
He stopped the car, the car came to a stop.
00:02:13.120 --> 00:02:15.120
They had an altercation.
00:02:15.120 --> 00:02:20.800
Uh, the deputy thought he saw uh drug paraphernalia and saw evidence of methamphetamine in the car.
00:02:20.800 --> 00:02:24.319
The guy takes off in the car and a vehicle pursuit ensues.
00:02:24.319 --> 00:02:27.280
The deputy chases him and then the pursuit was called off.
00:02:27.280 --> 00:02:31.919
And a couple weeks later, the deputy was on the highway and he sees this car.
00:02:31.919 --> 00:02:36.639
He pulls up beside the car, he identifies the driver as the same suspect.
00:02:36.639 --> 00:02:39.360
The deputy, his name's Deputy Anthony Gann.
00:02:39.360 --> 00:02:40.319
That's public knowledge.
00:02:40.319 --> 00:02:43.520
There's news stories on this, so I'm not concerned about giving his name out.
00:02:43.520 --> 00:02:50.639
By the way, what a fine young man, young deputy in his 20s, very articulate, uh, very smart.
00:02:50.639 --> 00:02:57.280
He actually called the DA on the phone while he was driving, probably something I wouldn't have done and said, Hey, I've got I'm behind this car again.
00:02:57.280 --> 00:03:00.080
Can I go ahead and stop the car and arrest him for this last offense?
00:03:00.080 --> 00:03:04.400
And the DA said, Well, go ahead and get new probable cause and have an interaction with him.
00:03:04.400 --> 00:03:05.280
So he does.
00:03:05.280 --> 00:03:12.879
He gets a violation behind the wheel, behind the car, and he goes to stop the car for that traffic violation, and the car takes off.
00:03:12.879 --> 00:03:15.680
Probably not surprising based on the initial encounter.
00:03:15.680 --> 00:03:23.759
And this pursuit lasted for seven minutes plus, pretty crazy pursuit, high speeds, long way down the interstate.
00:03:23.759 --> 00:03:27.520
And at some point, the car comes to a stop.
00:03:27.520 --> 00:03:32.719
The car basically starts smoking and he couldn't drive it anymore, and it comes to a stop right in the middle of the interstate.
00:03:32.719 --> 00:03:38.479
And about the time the car comes to a stop, a passenger, a female, goes rolling out of the car.
00:03:38.479 --> 00:03:44.080
Now, you got to put yourself in any use of force encounter, you have to put yourself in the mindset of the officer.
00:03:44.080 --> 00:03:45.919
So, what are you thinking here, right?
00:03:45.919 --> 00:03:47.840
And the officer actually testified, he didn't know.
00:03:47.840 --> 00:03:49.199
He was like, Is she a victim?
00:03:49.199 --> 00:03:50.560
Is she a kidnapping victim?
00:03:50.560 --> 00:03:51.520
Is she part of this?
00:03:51.520 --> 00:03:52.879
Is she an associate?
00:03:52.879 --> 00:04:01.360
It all goes to the state of mind of the officer when you talk about the human factors involved in making a split-second decision for use of force.
00:04:01.360 --> 00:04:11.039
And eventually he orders the female to get back away and she complies, which probably helps you with decision making because he probably thinks, okay, she's probably not an adversary, she's complying with me.
00:04:11.039 --> 00:04:14.560
And this car comes to a stop, and he is doing a felony car stop.
00:04:14.560 --> 00:04:23.360
For those of you that don't know what that is, that is you don't approach the car, you stay a distance away from the car, his gun's pointed at the car, and he's ordering the guy to get out of the car.
00:04:23.360 --> 00:04:36.399
And the suspect uh is not only not getting out of the car, but he starts making all of these moves that simulates, in my opinion, and the deputy's opinion, that he had a firearm.
00:04:36.399 --> 00:04:39.360
And this goes on for minutes.
00:04:39.360 --> 00:04:54.720
Uh and I when I evaluated the video, this is all on video, I saw you know 18 plus behaviors that would have given a reasonable officer reason to believe that there's high danger here.
00:04:54.720 --> 00:05:00.319
I mean, he comes out of the car at one point with his one arm hidden, like he's pointing the weapon with the other.
00:05:00.319 --> 00:05:08.800
At one point, he's lunching down the car, and the deputy actually verbalized that he he believed that he was loading a weapon or loading a magazine.
00:05:08.800 --> 00:05:12.160
He's reaching in the back of the car, he's reaching underneath the seat.
00:05:12.160 --> 00:05:14.720
At some point, he sees an object in the suspect's hands.
00:05:14.720 --> 00:05:18.399
Now keep in mind, this is an interstate, there's traffic flowing, there's civilians around.
00:05:18.399 --> 00:05:24.959
Deputy's looking through the back window and he's seeing this, and he actually verbalizes on the radio, I think he has a gun.
00:05:24.959 --> 00:05:28.879
And this continues until the backing officer arrives.
00:05:28.879 --> 00:05:44.079
And the backing officer gets out, very similar to the first deputy, felony stop, gun downrange, giving him commands, and the backing officer tells Deputy Gann, he says, I think he has a gun.
00:05:44.079 --> 00:05:48.399
And that was the confirmation the deputy was looking for.
00:05:48.399 --> 00:05:52.399
The deputy had a pretty good reason to believe that he had a gun.
00:05:52.399 --> 00:05:55.040
He didn't take action on that belief.
00:05:55.040 --> 00:06:09.199
But when the backing officer very definitively said he has a gun, he'd already seen, obviously, the primary officer had already saw an object in his hand, uh, Deputy Gann started firing his weapon, and he fired his weapon until the suspect stops moving.
00:06:09.199 --> 00:06:16.480
And when the they go up and clear the car, they they don't find a gun, but they find a butcher knife buried into the suspect's chest.
00:06:16.480 --> 00:06:20.560
So what the suspect was actually doing was stabbing himself with this butcher knife.
00:06:20.560 --> 00:06:22.000
That was the object in the hand.
00:06:22.000 --> 00:06:26.800
So when you look at this from uh use of force analysis and law enforcement in Graham B.
00:06:26.800 --> 00:06:32.399
Connor, of course, Gramby Connor is a signature use of force case that dictates use of force.
00:06:32.399 --> 00:06:39.120
It talks about reasonableness, it talks about what you know at the time, it talks about giving deference to having to make split-second decisions.
00:06:39.120 --> 00:06:42.319
And when you look at it from those standpoint, yeah, it's tragic.
00:06:42.319 --> 00:06:43.519
The guy didn't have a gun.
00:06:43.519 --> 00:06:46.879
He was, it looked like he was trying to kill himself, actually.
00:06:46.879 --> 00:06:53.120
Um, but it's uh it's gonna be a legal justified shooting to anybody that sort of has knowledge in this area.
00:06:53.120 --> 00:07:01.360
The sheriff there, um that was the sheriff of that agency, agreed and found it in policy.
00:07:01.360 --> 00:07:06.639
And the next thing you know, this was shipped off to another county uh to rule.
00:07:06.639 --> 00:07:11.040
Instead of the DA there in that county just saying, Yeah, I I went to law school.
00:07:11.040 --> 00:07:14.720
I took that hour in class on use of force for law enforcement.
00:07:14.720 --> 00:07:16.800
They actually don't spend very long on it.
00:07:16.800 --> 00:07:22.720
Um, and the sheriff said it's in policy, and maybe they've consulted with a few experts, which by the way, DAs do all the time.
00:07:22.720 --> 00:07:26.240
They'll concert with use of force experts and say, tell me about this case.
00:07:26.240 --> 00:07:28.639
It's obviously not criminal.
00:07:28.639 --> 00:07:31.040
Um, that's not what the DA did.
00:07:31.040 --> 00:07:34.079
The DA shipped it to another county for them to decide.
00:07:34.079 --> 00:07:36.879
And that DA didn't make a decision.
00:07:36.879 --> 00:07:39.839
That DA sent the case to the grand jury.
00:07:39.839 --> 00:07:42.800
Now we see this a lot in jurisdictions around the country.
00:07:42.800 --> 00:07:52.240
I think it's a weak, cowardly move uh because it's it's it's taking the decision-making process off the elected official that got elected to make these decisions.
00:07:52.240 --> 00:07:53.680
You see this abused a lot.
00:07:53.680 --> 00:07:57.360
Austin, Texas, is one place where that DA has abused us a lot.
00:07:57.360 --> 00:08:02.879
We've seen a lot of officers prosecuted in Austin because he sends every case to a grand jury.
00:08:02.879 --> 00:08:06.319
Well, why would a DA do that instead of just making a decision?
00:08:06.319 --> 00:08:20.720
Well, I'm not going to tell you why this was done in any place, especially uh in Seward County, but I would tell you, in my opinion, the grand jury process is not uh something that anybody wants to go through from a defendant standpoint.
00:08:20.720 --> 00:08:30.879
Because in a grand jury process, there's a reason why uh Sol Waxler, the former chief judge of Newark Court of Appeals, he he said it.
00:08:30.879 --> 00:08:35.120
He says the grand jury can, quote, indict a ham sandwich, end quote.
00:08:35.120 --> 00:08:37.120
Why did Sol say that?
00:08:37.120 --> 00:08:39.440
He said that because of the grand jury process.
00:08:39.440 --> 00:08:41.200
It's not a full adversarial case.
00:08:41.200 --> 00:08:43.360
The defense cannot present a full defense.
00:08:43.360 --> 00:08:49.360
The prosecutor can sort of present whatever evidence they think can set a narrative a certain way.
00:08:49.360 --> 00:08:53.120
And the grand jury doesn't really have two sides of the story, so to speak.
00:08:53.120 --> 00:09:00.399
Now, I'm not saying every DA does it this way, but it's obviously easy in a grand jury setting to indict a ham sandwich.
00:09:00.399 --> 00:09:06.159
And Deputy Gann was unfortunately the ham sandwich, and he was indicted by the grand jury.
00:09:06.159 --> 00:09:07.759
This is why I got the call.
00:09:07.759 --> 00:09:13.200
And the lawyer tells his story to me and said he was looking for a use of force expert.
00:09:13.200 --> 00:09:26.879
Now, I do a fair bit of expert work case in a lot of different areas, but when it comes to a criminal case use of force, I thought to myself, Matt, I probably ought to, you know, I could, I certainly could do this, but I know some of the best in the business.
00:09:26.879 --> 00:09:28.799
I know Jamie Borden and Von Klein.
00:09:28.799 --> 00:09:31.759
A lot of people that are listening to this podcast are really, really good at this stuff.
00:09:31.759 --> 00:09:33.120
They do this each and every day.
00:09:33.120 --> 00:09:35.519
I said, let me let me hook you up with these guys.
00:09:35.519 --> 00:09:38.159
And the attorney says, Well, I have a use of force expert.
00:09:38.159 --> 00:09:44.080
I have Jeff Martin out of California, and Jeff's a really good expert, really good, high-end use of force expert.
00:09:44.080 --> 00:09:45.120
I said, Well, why do you need me?
00:09:45.120 --> 00:09:56.559
He goes, Well, you teach this course on pre-attack indicators and and behavior cues that occur before violence, and this case is going to lean on that because of all of the behaviors the suspect did.
00:09:56.559 --> 00:10:04.639
And he's right, I for 10, 15 years, I've been really soaked in this world of pre-incident indicators and what occurs before violence.
00:10:04.639 --> 00:10:18.720
And we're working on some research validated training right now called Focus, Build Observable Cues for Unknown Situations that brings research into this, and we're really diving deep into this for the very reason for what this case is about.
00:10:18.720 --> 00:10:29.200
DAs don't understand behavior, police chiefs don't understand behavior, juries don't understand this type of behavior, and we need to bring a high-level approach to this.
00:10:29.200 --> 00:10:32.080
And and we actually, I've actually taught the class already.
00:10:32.080 --> 00:10:34.320
We rubbed the class out, websites are going up now.
00:10:34.320 --> 00:10:36.559
That's not what this that's not what this podcast is about.
00:10:36.559 --> 00:10:39.200
The point is, that's why I was brought into the case.
00:10:39.200 --> 00:10:41.279
And we go to work on the case.
00:10:41.279 --> 00:10:43.919
Uh, Anthony had an excellent team.
00:10:43.919 --> 00:10:45.679
I feel very confident in Jeff Martin.
00:10:45.679 --> 00:10:48.799
I feel confident what I can bring to that to the team as well.
00:10:48.799 --> 00:10:50.960
The attorney was very, very good.
00:10:50.960 --> 00:10:56.559
And quite frankly, the attorney the entire time was just going, I'm not, I don't even understand how we got here.
00:10:56.559 --> 00:10:58.000
Like, this is not even close.
00:10:58.000 --> 00:10:59.279
And he's correct.
00:10:59.279 --> 00:11:02.399
In fact, there were some weird things going on.
00:11:02.399 --> 00:11:04.080
I'll give you an example.
00:11:04.080 --> 00:11:11.919
They brought the charges against Deputy Gann under a statute in Nebraska called sudden quarrel.
00:11:11.919 --> 00:11:22.799
And what a sudden quarrel is, is considered a provocation that would cause a reasonable person to lose self-control and kill someone in the heat of passion.
00:11:22.799 --> 00:11:27.120
Let me explain to you how ridiculous that charge is.
00:11:27.120 --> 00:11:28.960
This isn't a bar fight.
00:11:28.960 --> 00:11:32.240
This isn't a domestic violence crime, heat of passion.
00:11:32.240 --> 00:11:36.159
This is a law enforcement officer operating under the color of law.
00:11:36.159 --> 00:11:38.159
They don't have the options a citizen has.
00:11:38.159 --> 00:11:43.679
A citizen that saw that type of behavior could walk away, could leave, could call 911.
00:11:43.679 --> 00:11:46.960
That's not the options that Deputy Gann had.
00:11:46.960 --> 00:11:50.720
But why would they bring that charge forward?
00:11:50.720 --> 00:11:51.919
Right?
00:11:51.919 --> 00:11:56.159
And avoid the fact that he was acting as a police officer.
00:11:56.159 --> 00:12:06.960
Well, when you act under a police officer, you obviously have to discuss everything that myself and Jeff will talk about human factors and stress and training and policy.
00:12:06.960 --> 00:12:10.159
And of course, we know all that was on the side of Deputy Gantt.
00:12:10.159 --> 00:12:13.519
And once again, I'm not going to get in the mind of this DA.
00:12:13.519 --> 00:12:20.480
Because what these cowards like to do is to sue and to quiet and things like that.
00:12:20.480 --> 00:12:22.879
And he has full immunity, by the way.
00:12:22.879 --> 00:12:24.879
You can't sue DAs, you can't sue judges.
00:12:24.879 --> 00:12:30.080
So they get the opportunity to make these kind of decisions that affect the lives of people forever.
00:12:30.080 --> 00:12:34.720
Because Deputy Gann will his life will never be the same going through this.
00:12:34.720 --> 00:12:49.679
Followed policy, followed training, and finds himself indicted under a sudden choral statute.
00:12:49.679 --> 00:12:51.120
Kind of weird.
00:12:51.120 --> 00:12:57.039
In fact, if I was a conspiracy theorist, I may say they're trying to stack the deck against him.
00:12:57.039 --> 00:13:00.399
I don't know what they were trying to do, but here we are.
00:13:00.399 --> 00:13:03.600
And so I get deposed in this case.
00:13:03.600 --> 00:13:05.600
And oddly they don't depose Jeff Martin.
00:13:05.600 --> 00:13:06.639
I don't understand that.
00:13:06.639 --> 00:13:12.720
But what a deposition is, is before the case is the DA is they want to know what you're going to say at trial.
00:13:12.720 --> 00:13:15.200
So they they sort of get inside baseball.
00:13:15.200 --> 00:13:22.960
So and then they also, if you don't say the deposition, would you say something different at the trial, they'll say, oh, you're not, you didn't say that deposition, and you changed your mind.
00:13:22.960 --> 00:13:24.960
They'll try to confuse the jury.
00:13:24.960 --> 00:13:32.879
And so this was sort of a big deal for me because I knew it was important because Deputy Gann's facing 20 years in prison.
00:13:32.879 --> 00:13:37.200
And I prepared immensely for this deposition.
00:13:37.200 --> 00:13:41.759
And I went into this deposition, and I was pretty shocked how this deposition went.
00:13:41.759 --> 00:13:47.440
In fact, very little was even asked of me about the behavior of the suspect.
00:13:47.440 --> 00:13:49.360
That seems to matter to me.
00:13:49.360 --> 00:13:55.840
Deputy Gann made a split-second decision to use deadly force based on the behavior he was observing.
00:13:55.840 --> 00:14:02.080
I was an expert in that behavior, and they didn't ask very much at all about that.
00:14:02.080 --> 00:14:11.519
They also seemed very confused about case law around deadly force and law enforcement, specifically Graham B.
00:14:11.519 --> 00:14:13.600
Connor and some other cases.
00:14:13.600 --> 00:14:16.000
So it was kind of an odd one.
00:14:16.000 --> 00:14:24.320
Now, you know, they always try to play tricks, you know, and depositions, you know, sort of lawyer tricks, you know, they'll maybe say some things and get you to answer things.
00:14:24.320 --> 00:14:26.080
And I pushed back a little bit.
00:14:26.080 --> 00:14:27.120
I wasn't rude at all.
00:14:27.120 --> 00:14:29.679
I thought it was very professional for both him and me.
00:14:29.679 --> 00:14:31.679
I thought he was, for the most part, professional.
00:14:31.679 --> 00:14:33.759
I believe I was for the most part professional.
00:14:33.759 --> 00:14:35.679
But there was some push and tug.
00:14:35.679 --> 00:14:38.000
That's just a proceeding, that's what occurs.
00:14:38.000 --> 00:14:40.960
And obviously we have the transcripts to show that.
00:14:40.960 --> 00:14:44.240
And so we're moving towards the trial.
00:14:44.240 --> 00:14:49.600
And the trial starting on a Monday, and on Friday afternoon.
00:14:49.600 --> 00:14:50.559
Now, let me back up.
00:14:50.559 --> 00:15:04.720
Between the deposition and the trial date, the prosecutor submitted a brief to the judge to remove the experts from the case, to remove policy from the case, to remove any of the training from the case that can't be discussed at trial.
00:15:04.720 --> 00:15:13.600
Now that's a typical maneuver that's done, and quite frankly, it rarely ever works because most judges would go, well, that seems a little unfair.
00:15:13.600 --> 00:15:18.480
Here's a police officer that's operating under policy, operating under his training.
00:15:18.480 --> 00:15:23.679
He's brought experts in to help explain what that means to the jury to help them understand.
00:15:23.679 --> 00:15:26.720
So, yes, that needs to be part of the trial.
00:15:26.720 --> 00:15:30.639
But so I didn't take it too seriously.
00:15:30.639 --> 00:15:47.200
But Friday afternoon before the Monday trial, the judge made the decision that I couldn't testify, Jeff Martin couldn't testify, policy couldn't be mentioned, and training couldn't be mentioned.
00:15:47.200 --> 00:15:55.120
They said things like in this, the this things like Jeff and I had over inflated our resume.
00:15:55.120 --> 00:15:57.600
Well, if anything, we didn't put enough in the resume.
00:15:57.600 --> 00:16:04.639
Said things that we would just confuse the jury.
00:16:04.639 --> 00:16:08.879
They said the jury could just watch the video and decide themselves.
00:16:08.879 --> 00:16:09.840
Really?
00:16:09.840 --> 00:16:19.600
Research says that about half of the general public will watch videos and not understand what legal or illegal or justified or unjustified use of force is.
00:16:19.600 --> 00:16:20.320
We know that.
00:16:20.320 --> 00:16:23.679
By the way, DA likely knew that as well.
00:16:23.679 --> 00:16:26.639
So who's trying to sow confusion?
00:16:26.639 --> 00:16:34.240
Is it me or is it a judge and a prosecutor not trying to give a jury as much information as possible to make a decision?
00:16:34.240 --> 00:16:36.639
I'll let you be the judge of that.
00:16:36.639 --> 00:16:46.159
And so obviously, my opinion is they were trying to stack the deck against Deputy Gann.
00:16:46.159 --> 00:16:51.120
They didn't want Deputy Gann to put on the defense that he had planned to put on the entire time.
00:16:51.120 --> 00:16:57.759
Remember, this was two days before the trial was to start, and his entire defense got ripped away from it.
00:16:57.759 --> 00:17:12.480
Now, in Nebraska, the only way by law you can ban experts in a trial is if you can prove that their testimony would not be relevant or they would not be able to assist the jury in understanding evidence.
00:17:12.480 --> 00:17:25.279
Now you could badmouth me all you want and say Travis is just a buffoon and he would confuse them, but to say Jeff Martin could not assist and he's not relevant, the guy's a forensic video expert, one of the best in the country.
00:17:25.279 --> 00:17:28.000
And the main evidence in this was video.
00:17:28.000 --> 00:17:36.640
But the court's quote from their ruling was the jury can just view the video for themselves and draw their own conclusions.
00:17:36.640 --> 00:17:42.799
Yeah, no need to have any expertise whatsoever to help the jury with a rapidly evolving law enforcement decision.
00:17:42.799 --> 00:17:47.200
After all, this is just a sudden quarrel, a crime of passion.
00:17:47.200 --> 00:17:49.519
You understand where I'm going with this.
00:17:49.519 --> 00:17:54.400
And the reason I'm discussing this with you is this is not just happening in Omaha, Nebraska.
00:17:54.400 --> 00:17:57.200
This is happening across the country.
00:17:57.200 --> 00:18:00.720
And no one's talking about it.
00:18:00.720 --> 00:18:09.440
Yeah, you've got Von Klaim, and you've got some, you know, and you've got some really good people out there talking about it, but where are the police organizations?
00:18:09.440 --> 00:18:13.759
Where's these leadership gurus you see all over your social media feeds, right?
00:18:13.759 --> 00:18:16.400
Posting their latest John Maxwell quotes.
00:18:16.400 --> 00:18:18.880
No one is talking about this.
00:18:18.880 --> 00:18:20.720
I mean, where's the unions?
00:18:20.720 --> 00:18:23.359
The national unions, the national organizations.
00:18:23.359 --> 00:18:28.880
It's sickening to me that we have a profession that's having to endure this.
00:18:28.880 --> 00:18:34.400
Can you imagine being a police officer in Seward County, Nebraska, and this decision was made?
00:18:34.400 --> 00:18:36.160
I mean, can you imagine that?
00:18:36.160 --> 00:18:39.039
And what this does is a chilling effect, right?
00:18:39.039 --> 00:18:42.319
Officers will hesitate.
00:18:42.319 --> 00:18:45.359
They will place themselves in more danger.
00:18:45.359 --> 00:18:47.519
They will get hurt.
00:18:47.519 --> 00:18:56.480
They will die across this country if they're scared that they're going to be prosecuted for following rule policies and procedures.
00:18:56.480 --> 00:18:57.920
And you can't separate the two.
00:18:57.920 --> 00:18:59.680
You can't separate policies and training.
00:18:59.680 --> 00:19:05.279
It's not like in the police academy, we sat here and say, here's your policy, here's your training.
00:19:05.279 --> 00:19:07.680
Now let's talk about the sudden quarrel statutes.
00:19:07.680 --> 00:19:08.640
No, that doesn't occur.
00:19:08.640 --> 00:19:09.759
That's ridiculous.
00:19:09.759 --> 00:19:16.880
What's this is this is so rampant in law enforcement training, every cop listening is going to know what I'm about to say.